ÈÍÒÅËÐÎÑ > ¹1, 2019 > Comments on the Tom Rockmore’s article “Some consequences of Kant’s Copernican turn” Vladimir I. Przhilenskiy
|
The “remarks” assess the consistency of T. Rockmore’s assertion that Kant’s philosophy creates the possibility of further development of anti-representationalist and constructivist ideas. They criticize the reduction of the turn to the statement that phenomena are only representations, not things-in-themselves. Rockmore’s interpretation of the turn is opposed to a more traditional position whereby I. Kant changed a ratio of theoretical and practical in the hierarchy of knowledge, which caused a “revolutionary” and “turnable” revision of the whole idea of mind, its structure and content. Âåðíóòüñÿ íàçàä |