Все журналы
Все авторы
42464 публикаций
23693 авторов
Все лекции

Tom Rockmore
Replies to comments by Profs. Katrechko and Przhilenskiy

The replies given by the author to Profs. Katrechko and Prof. Przhilenskiy are very different. Prof. Katrechko approaches Kant as if he was a contemporary thinker simultaneously committed to correlationism, a semanticist, a follower of Strawson, a representationalist, and so on. The response is that he is not a contemporary thinker. What remains is Prof. Katrechko’s view that he shares with some other Kantian scholars that the critical philosophy is a form of representationalism. Prof. Przhilenskiy begins by agreeing that Kant can in fact be read as supporting anti-representational and constructivist ideas, while suggesting that the Copernican turn can be read in different ways. He attributes to the author the view that phenomena are just representations, whereas, on the contrary, the author claims, though perhaps not clearly enough, that the mature Kant turns away from representationalism.

Tom Rockmore
Some consequences of Kant’s Copernican turn

Kant turns from an early representational view of cognition to a later anti-representational, epistemic constructivist view, often simply referred to as the Copernican revolution or the Copernican turn. Kant’s Copernican turn belongs to the modern, non-standard interest in epistemic constructivism. At least since Parmenides the standard approach to cognition requires knowledge of the real, reality or the world. In modern philosophy this approach is countered by the emergence of epistemic constructivism as a non-standard solution for the cognitive problem in Francis Bacon, Hobbes, Vico, and others, and independently in Kant. This paper briefly describes consequences of Kant’s Copernican turn concerning at least five themes: (i) cognition, (ii) German idealism, (iii) the subject, (iv) the historical character of knowledge and (v) the success or failure of the philosophical tradition.

Tom Rockmore
Sellars’ Logical Space of Reasons and Kant’s Copernican Revolution

Wilfrid Sellars’s currently influential approach to knowledge follows Kant in rejecting the given in favor of an approach to knowledge based on the logical space of reasons

Новости дня Мониторинг зарубежной прессы
"Что-то из фильма ужасов": кризис здравоохранения в России ускоряет упадок сельской местности
Восхваление терроризма: удручающее количество онлайн-ненависти после убийства Самюэля Пэти
850 000 пока неоткрытых вирусов животных могут инфицировать людей, предупреждают ученые
НАС ЧИТАЮТ В 155 СТРАНАХ
Free counters!
Поддержите нас
ЛЕКЦИЯ ДНЯ

Все лекции



Александр Неклесса. ПОЕЗД В БУДУЩЕЕ

Последние выпуски бюллетеня "ИНТЕЛРОС - Интеллектуальная Россия" можно приобрести в магазине "Фаланстер".

БУДУЩЕЕ КАК НЕЗАВЕРШЕННЫЙ ПРОЕКТ

free counters
Copyright © . Журнал "ИНТЕЛРОС – Интеллектуальная Россия". Все права защищены и охраняются законом. Свидетельство о регистрации СМИ ПИ №77-18303. При полном или частичном использовании материалов, разрешенных к воспроизведению, ссылка на журнал "ИНТЕЛРОС – Интеллектуальная Россия" обязательна (в Интернете – гиперссылка на www.intelros.ru). Адрес электронной почты редакции: intelros@intelros.ru. Редакция не несет ответственности за достоверность информации, содержащейся в рекламе и объявлениях.
Яндекс.Метрика liveinternet.ru Рейтинг@Mail.ru