“revolution”, “democracy”, “sovereignty”, “political”, etc. The postanarchist perspective, revealing distinctly anarchic features in current forms of radical politics (decentralization, network character, distrust of official institutions), also offers its own reinterpretation of a series of concepts on purpose of radicalizing and updating libertarian theory. In particular, this article focuses on the logic of differentiating the concepts of revolution and insurrection, which is carried out by the leading theorist of postanarchism S. Newman, who starts from the philosophical individualism of M. Stirner and also proceeds from the crisis of metanarratives proclaimed by the postmodern. Furthermore, within the framework of an attempt to define a new political subject, that is common to Western left thought, Newman develops the concept of singularity in a number of his texts, actively using the philosophical studies of some continental thinkers. Finally, in terms of postanarchism, the conceptualization of political action and the subject of this action through the concepts of rebellion and singularity not only contributes to the clarification and revitalization of anarchist discourse but is itself a subversive gesture that destabilizes the normative political language.
Keywords: postanarchism, insurrection, revolution, singularity, identity, autonomy, anti-political politics
For citation: Polyakov, D.B. “Vosstanie singulyarnostei. Kontseptualizatsiya (anti)politicheskogo deistviya v postanarkhizme” [Insurrection of singularities. A conceptualization of (anti)political action in postanarchism], Filosofskii zhurnal / Philosophy Journal, 2021, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 21–34. (In Russian)
Agamben, G. Gryadushchee soobshchestvo [The Coming Community], trans. by D. Novikov. Moscow: Tri kvadrata Publ., 2008. 144 pp. (In Russian)
Bakunin, M.A. “Bog i gosudarstvo (2)” [God and the State (2)], in: M.A. Bakunin, Izbrannye filosofskie sochineniya i pis’ma [Selected Philosophical Writings and Letters]. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., 1987, pp. 494–521. (In Russian)
Baudrillard, J. Sovershennoe prestuplenie. Zagovor iskusstva [The Perfect Crime. The Conspiracy of Art]. Moscow: Company group RIPOL klassik Publ.; Pangloss Publ., 2019. 347 pp. (In Russian)
Call, L. Postmodern anarchism. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2002. 159 pp.
Davydov, D.A. Lichnost’ i gosudarstvo v terniyah postkapitalizma: Na puti k novoj antagonisticheskoj formacii [Personality and State in the Thorns of Post-Capitalism: Towards a New Antagonistic Formation]. Moscow: LENAND Publ., 2020. 218 pp. (In Russian)
Foucault, M. Muzhestvo istiny. Upravlenie soboj i drugimi II. Kurs lekcij, prochitannyh v Kollezh de Frans v 1983–1984 uchebnom godu [The Courage of Truth (The Government of Self and Others II): Lectures at the Collège de France, 1983–1984], trans. by A.V. Dyakov. St. Petersburg: Nauka Publ., 2014. 358 pp. (In Russian)
Foucault, M. Volya k istine: Po tu storonu znaniya, vlasti i seksual’nosti. Raboty raznyh let [The Will to Truth: Beyond Knowledge, Power and Sexuality. Works of different years], trans. by S. Tabachnikova. Moscow: Kastal’ Publ., 1996. 448 pp. (In Russian)
Hardt, M. & Negri, A. Imperiya [Empire], ed. by G.V. Kamenskaya and M.S. Fetisov. Moscow: Praksis Publ., 2004. 440 pp. (In Russian)
Klein, N. Zabory i okna: Hroniki antiglobalizacionnogo dvizheniya [Fences and windows Dispatches from the Front Lines of the Globalization Debate], trans. by A. Dorman. Moscow: Dobraya kniga Publ., 2005. 304 pp. (In Russian)
Koch, A.M. “Max Stirner: The Last Hegelian or the First Poststructuralist?”, Anarchist Studies, 1997, No. 5, pp. 95–107.
May, T. The Political Philosophy of Poststructuralist Anarchism. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1994. 165 pp.
Meillassoux, Q. Posle konechnosti: Esse o neobhodimosti kontingentnosti [After Finitude: An Essay on The Necessity of Contingency], trans. by L. Medvedeva. Ekaterinburg; Moscow: Kabinetnyj uchenyj Publ., 2015. 196 pp. (In Russian)