Другие журналы на сайте ИНТЕЛРОС

Журнальный клуб Интелрос » Социологическое обозрение » т. 14, №4, 2015

Александр Марков
Вытесняя Fear, приручая Warre: «постмакиавеллистская» политика раннего Нового времени

Рецензия:
Иванова Ю. В., Соколов П.В. (2014) Кроме Макиавелли: проблема метода в политических науках раннего Нового времени,
М.: Квадрига. Библиографическое описание: DOI: 10.17323/1728-192X-2015-4-204-208.

Suppressing the Fear, Taming the Warre:

Early Modern “Post-Machiavellian” Politics

Alexander Markov

Doctor of Philology, Senior Researcher, Department of Christian Culture,

Institute of World Culture, Lomonosov Moscow State University

Deputy Dean, Faculty of the History of Arts, Russian State University for the Humanities

Address: Leninskie Gory GSP-1, 119991 Moscow, Russian Federation

E-mail: markovius@gmail.com

In a sense, this book deals with the ways of taming the underlying civil Warre between early modern authors: from the Giambattista Vico’s “most certain criticism of the voluntary action” to Pieter and Johan De la Court’s “therapeutic politics.” The terrifying perspective of the “catastrophe and disaster”, which pushed Machiavelli to the extremes of political ammoralism, permeated the reflection of both his admirers and critics, causing them to seek refuge in the Sovereign’s will, in the double-edged rhetoric of the “beneficent violence,” or in the shady hypothesis of the physiological substrate of sociability (W. Harvey, R. Cumberland).

 

Do not be mislead by the title: this book is not about how political theory as a strict discipline found its own method in resisting Machiavellian voluntarism. The authors are well aware that polemics contra Machiavelli are not enough to transform ethical or practical observations into political science. Ivanova and Sokolov have chosen much broader research perspective: if we want to answer the question, “How does method work in political science?”, we need to explore generally how methods have emerged in the humanities. The main question is: what happened in the humanities when they ceased to be a kind of art, but were yet to become a form of institutional knowledge?



Другие статьи автора: Марков Александр

Архив журнала
№3, 2020соц№1, 2021№2, 2021№3, 2021со№4, 2021№2, 2020№1, 2020№3, 2019№4, 2019№1, 2019№3, 2018№2, 2018№1, 2018№4, 2017т. 16 № 3, 2017т. 16, №2, 2017т. 16, № 1, 2017т. 15, №4, 2016т. 15, №3, 2016т. 15, №2, 2016т. 15, №1, 2016т. 14, №4, 2015т. 14, №3, 2015т. 14, №2, 2015т. 14, № 1, 2015т. 13, №4, 2014т. 13, №3, 2014т. 13, №2, 2014т. 13, №1, 2014т. 12, №3, 2013т. 12, №2, 2013т. 12, №1, 2013т. 11, №3, 2012т. 11, №2, 2012т. 11, №1, 2012т. 10, №3, 2011т. 10, №1-2, 2011т. 9, №3, 2010т. 9, №2, 2010т. 9, №1, 2010т. 8, №3, 2009т. 8, №2, 2009
Поддержите нас
Журналы клуба