As the war in Southeast Asia wound down, the Joint Chiefs of Staff began a slow
and sometimes uncomfortable reassessment of their military plans and policies.
Similar reassessments had followed previous wars and invariably had given rise to
passionate inter-Service rivalries and intense competition for resources. Some of
these elements, to be sure, were present in the aftermath of Vietnam. But compared
to the build-downs that followed World War II and Korea, the transition following
Vietnam was relatively smooth and easy. Indeed, the most serious problems that
arose were in developing military policies and a force posture compatible with a
rapidly changing international environment dominated by the prospect of a new era
in Soviet-American relations known as "détente.”
|